The Institute for Economics and Peace has published a recent report “The Cost of Violence Containment.” After defining violence containment spending as “economic activity related to the consequences or prevention of violence where the violence is directed against people or property” they calculate the global cost at $9.46 trillion. The report goes on to state: “The old idea of war being good for the economy has been thoroughly debunked and the economic benefits of encouraging peace are increasingly being recognised.”
I am pleased to announce availability of a new on-line course titled “Pursuing Collective Wisdom”.
This is the newest offering in the Wikiversity Applied Wisdom curriculum, and is freely available to anyone with an Internet connection.
The course builds on the previously published “Collective Wisdom Index Alpha” and incorporates improvements suggested by many helpful GC member comments on that earlier effort.
Don’t miss today’s BBC2 TV Horizon documentary.
The good things we want to achieve by fixing the worlds ills are no-brainers. How we achieve decisions – by democratic or revolutionary means – to achieve our aims is a more difficult and immediate problem.
The people hunted and gathered food to feed their families. They built shelters and tools, and they sang, and danced, and worked and played together in small groups, tribes, and villages, and it was good.
Some groups had plenty, others suffered shortages, so the people were happy to share and help one another. Everyone could remember a time when they had suffered shortages and others generously shared, and it was good.
Some people were naturally better at hunting, some better at gathering, some better at making tools, and still others better at using tools. They were happy to share among each other, and it was good.
Great explorers brought back stories of other people, living in strange and distant lands, with their own ways and their own skills and their own things. The adventuresome and the curious visited. We gave them our gifts, and they gave us their gifts. Culture flourished, and it was good.
As the territory expanded the exchanges became too many to remember, so they began a tally to record each gift. Some used small stones, others gathered distinctive shells, some used beads, and still others recoded the tally as notches carved on animal bones. These records helped the people remember each exchange, and it was good.
Exchanges of food, clothing, tools, trinkets, materials, and help among people became more important as the culture became more enriched, skills specialized, and people became more interdependent, and it was good.
In some villages an elder would make several distinctive metal disks decorated with various noble symbols. The elder wouldexchange these tokens at a standard rate for genuine notes signed by trustworthy villagers. The tokens were more durable, had a standard value, were recognizable, and were easier to exchange. Because they were trusted and accepted as readily as the signed promissory notes, they became widely used, and it was good.
Sometimes a family was unsuccessful in hunting and gathering; they needed food, and had no tokens. Other people were fortunate in having enough food and also had tokens they could share. The people with tokens to spare were generous in lending tokens to those in need. A record was made of this loan, backed by an earnest promise to repay the loan as soon as the misfortune passed. Conditions eventually improved, hunting became successful, food was exchanged for tokens, and the loan was repaid. This happened often enough that certain people became skilled in the exchange of tokens and recording loans. They became known as bankers, named for the benches where they worked counting tokens, and it was good.
Of course the people who worked as bankers also needed food, clothing, and shelter. What they had to offer in exchange were tokens. So it soon became the custom to lend ten tokens today for an agreement to return eleven tokens one year later. The eleventh token paid to feed, clothe, and shelter the bankers. It was called interest and this seemed fair.
One year ten hungry villagers each borrowed ten tokens with the promise to each repay the banker with eleven tokens next year. They used the tokens to buy food for their families. Throughout the year they worked hard, their crops were successful, and they ate well. They even grew enough food to sell some surplus in exchange for tokens. But only 100 tokens were available throughout the entire village while 110 tokens were owed to the bank, and it was not good.